|
But
does it make 'em sick?
Like
all supposed causes of disease, the notion that aberrant prions cause
BSE (Want The Why Files guide
to mad-cow lingo?) and related diseases -- must satisfy the "Koch postulates."
The pioneering German microbiologist Robert
Koch argued -- and scientists now accept -- that only after a positive
answer to four questions can we say that agent "X" causes disease "Y":
The
agent must be present in every case of the disease;
The
agent must be isolated from the host and grown in a lab dish;
The
disease must be reproduced when a pure culture of the agent is inoculated
into a healthy susceptible host; and
The
same agent must be recovered again from the experimentally infected host.
So
it's cut and dried?
Not exactly. The hallowed postulates, a prime mover in the field of medical
microbiology, have some limitations:
Some
agents (including prions and viruses), do not grow in a lab dish, but
only in a living cell.
Ethically
speaking, you can't do your "healthy susceptible host" testing with
people, but with lab animals or livestock. Testing the infectivity of
a possible human pathogen in other animals always raises a question:
If the pathogen doesn't infect the lab animal, does that mean it cannot
infect humans?
In performing tests
to satisfy Koch, careful scientists always use uninoculated control animals,
so the only difference between the "experimental animals" and "control
animals" is the inoculation, or deliberate infection. Controls are used
to remove the chance that the experimental animals got sick for unrelated
reasons, such as their genetic makeup or some experimental conditions.
Tell me more
about microbes in their mysterious variety.
|