
Hurricanes
having such destructive habits, it's no surprise that emergency
managers want better predictions. Since evacuations are slow, costly
and disruptive, it's critical to know where the storm will be, and
how strong it will be, a couple of days in the future.
Key West, Fla., Aug. 12, 2004: A boarded-up
storefront carries a message for Hurricane Charley. AP
Photo/J. Pat Carter
Predictions must start from data on present
conditions, and scientists have some hair-raising technology for
gathering data. They fly above storms and parachute miniature weather stations into the maelstrom to get precise
data. They peer down from satellites to get the big picture. Then
they crank up computers that would humiliate that box on your desk.
Satellite data is always valuable over the
oceans, where hurricanes form and travel, but where observers are
uncommon. Satellite data can take many forms, from simple, visual-light
images of the clouds to data from individual wavelengths of light.
Data on water vapor are particularly useful,
says Christopher Velden, a hurricane researcher at the Space Science
and Engineering Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "Only
in the water vapor channel can you get information in clear, cloud-free
areas."
(click on image to start animation)

Images: CIMSS/AMSU
Instruments on the Geostationary Operational
Environmental Satellites measure heat radiation released by water
vapor in the upper atmosphere. By tracking movement, researchers
calculate wind speed and direction. Thus the satellite can see invisible
winds in the hurricane's environment that are crucial to steering
the storm.
A newer source of data, the NOAA-15
and NOAA-16 satellites, gives temperature readings from oxygen molecules
in the air. Again, the advantage is more, better data to feed computer
models of hurricane movement. "We send it to forecasters, so they
visually have information on current behavior," says Velden. "It's
very important to know how it is doing now, so that can be fed into
prediction models. The better they are initialized, hopefully the
better the prediction will be."
Over the past decade or so, improved software,
computers, satellites and aircraft have meant a steady improvement
in track forecasts, but the improvement is incremental, not revolutionary.
Today's three-day forecast is as accurate as a two-day forecast
during the late 1980s.
Average errors in the hurricane tracks are
now:
24-hours: 80 miles
48-hours: 110 miles
72 hours: 230 miles
Instead of offering one probable track, modern
hurricane predictions are shaped like a funnel. A line down the
center indicates the most likely track, but the cone shows the probability
of a strike based on similar hurricanes in the past. Anybody within
that cone, stresses Timothy Olander, a hurricane researcher at the
Space Science and Engineering Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison,
could come face-to-face with nature's worst storm.
The improved accuracy comes from better computer
models and better knowledge of atmospheric conditions in and near
the storm. Once the data are gathered, "We know pretty much what
moves a hurricane," said Edward Zipser, a meteorologist now
at the University of Utah, and who talked to us in 1998. "If you get accurate
data to start, the models are far more capable of forecasting the
flow patterns tomorrow or the next day."
As Zipser indicated, predicting a hurricane's
path is relatively straightforward, although it does involve massaging
a gob of data. Generally speaking, tropical cyclones move in response
to "steering winds" in their environment. The direction of these
winds depends on the high and low pressure zones near the storm.
Latitude also plays a role. Between about 10 and 30 degrees north
latitude, steady trade winds blow toward the west, pushing Atlantic
hurricanes from their origin near Africa toward the Caribbean and
United States. North of 30 degrees, prevailing westerlies push the
storms back toward the east.
"Steering winds" move hurricanes. Trade winds
blow hurricanes westward, but as the storms move north, they may
get caught by westerly winds and cycle back toward the east.
Map: USGS
Even if you can predict where a hurricane will
go, how strong will it be when it gets there? Forecasting intensity
is more problematic than path prediction, says Velden. The changes
in intensity may result from changing ocean conditions, Velden explains.
If the storm goes over a deep pool of warm water, it gets a surge
of power.
Atmospheric conditions such as wind shear
(a change in wind speed and/or direction with altitude) also matter.
"The atmospheric environment must be just right," says Velden. "A
lack of vertical wind shear between the surface and upper-level
winds allows it to convect without tilting over, and feed over the
energy source." In those conditions, the hurricane's heat engine
can be self-sustaining. If wind shear is too great, however, the
storm can be blown apart.
Wind-speed
forecasts show slight improvements in accuracy. Graph:
Hurricane
Research Division
At any rate, a run-of-the-mill hurricane can
become a rip-roaring monster with little warning. This year, Velden
says, "Charley jumped two categories in 24 hours," an increase in
maximum winds of 40 to 60 miles per hour. "It was a contracting
eye, much like a twirling skater who brings in the arms; it gets smaller,
but the spin gets faster."
Damage goes up exponentially as wind speeds
increase, making a category 4 storm many times as destructive as
a category 2 storm. Building damage, for example, increases from "moderate damage
to houses" in category 2 to "extreme structural damage."
Another problem is predicting rain intensity.
"What's the difference between a storm that drops five inches --
and one that drops 20?" Zipser asked. "It's not related to the rates
of wind." In fact, he notes, tropical storm Charlie -- which was
too sluggish to qualify as a hurricane -- dropped 15 to 20 inches
of rain on Del Rio, Texas in 1997.
Better precip predictions call for more understanding
of the physics of convective systems in thunderstorms and hurricanes,
Zipser noted. Precisely modeling the condensation of water particles
into bazillions of rain droplets is not easy, Zipser said. "We have
more to learn in terms of fundamental understanding of what controls
the intensity."
What's new in hurricane data?
|