|
1. A Beautiful Movie?
|
It's just a film...
Does
it matter how scientists and science are shown in films? People don't actually
get information from them, do they? It's hard to say exactly. Weingart,
for example, admits that "Films probably never portray scientists (or any
other characters) entirely realistically, as they are a form of art with
its own rules of dramatization and representation."
Diane Waldman, associate professor in the department of mass communications, teaches media history and criticism at the University of Denver. While she does not study science movies, she insists that films do inform attitudes: "The only thing that I can say definitively is that no films are 'just entertainment.' Even if they're entertaining they're still helping to construct ideas about science and scientists, particularly for people who have no direct experience with the subject." The point is your point of view Dunwoody, who does research on how people use The Why Files, says communications researchers and audience members alike are "biased by their own beliefs.... If you walk into Jurassic Park thinking that genetic research is a sinister idea, you'll walk out thinking it's even worse. Media messages basically reinforce existing beliefs." Read our medium-cool science-movie bibliography.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
| There are 1
2
3
4
pages in
this feature. Bibliography | Credits | Feedback | Search ©2002, University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. |
||||