|
|
In these experimental tanks, chemicals are added that cause tiny particles - including bacteria - to clump. The clumps are massive enough to settle to the bottom. Environmental engineer Jae Park says this "flocculation" process is a popular water-purification treatment.
These experimental filters at the University of Wisconsin-Madison use charcoal and sand to purify water. Civil engineers are testing better, cheaper ways to purify water - for use by municipal water systems and water bottlers alike. |
Contamination
- microbial and chemical While water bottlers promote their product as pure, natural
and safe, some critics have charged that it's more lightly regulated than
the "Tappier" pouring forth from the city spigot. In 1999, for example,
the Natural Resources
Defense Council (NRDC) tested more than 1,000 bottles of 103 brands
of bottled water, and found that while "most bottled water apparently is
of good quality," "about one-third of the waters tested contained levels
of contamination -- including synthetic organic chemicals, bacteria, and
arsenic -- in at least one sample that exceeded allowable limits under either
state or bottled water industry standards or guidelines." The report called
the existing system of state and federal regulation of bottled water "underfunded
and haphazard."
Jae Park, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, says that bottlers can use any of the techniques used by city purification plants, including treatment with ozone or ultraviolet light, filtration, and chemicals that cause contaminants to clot together and settle out. Some use no techniques, and some a combination of techniques. One chemical treatment that's out of favor among water bottlers, for reasons of taste, is chlorine. And partly as a result, says Park, "Drinking water is safer than bottled water."
Not so, says Stephen Kay, director of communications for the trade group the International Bottled Water Association (IBWA), who says bottled-water standards were tightened in the mid-1990s. And while the NRDC claimed that federal standards did not apply to the majority of bottled water, which does not cross state lines, Kay says the standards apply whenever the water, or even a bottlecap or label, crosses state lines. Still, two recent reports could raise eyebrows among the high-brows who get soused on water-in-a-bottle. Bacterial broth The results showed that "the source water for bottling industries must be kept free of contamination," the researchers wrote. They also recommended that bottled water be refrigerated to minimize pathogen growth (see "Behavior of..." in the bibliography). Thus the dilemma: Chlorine added to city water kills organisms that cause disease. But the residual chlorine not only can taste foul -- it also makes tap water safe to drink even after it been standing in your glass for a week. Not so bottled water. "Bottled water is safe, but if you leave it for a day in the sunlight with the cap open, bacteria may grow," says Park, who teaches water purification technology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "But if you have tap water left in the same condition, bacteria cannot grow, because of the chlorine." Bottle blues Curiously, two-month-old extracts from mineral water altered the DNA of test cells, even though samples stored for other periods did not. Using an analytical tool called a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer, the researchers found that levels of a plasticizer known to cause liver cancer increased as water was stored longer in the PET bottles (see "Evaluation of the Migration..." in the bibliography). Aside from the bottles themselves, the bottling plant also caused concern. The researchers noted that water sampled before it entered the plant showed little or no toxicity, compared to "very significant DNA damage in the water collected at the bottling plant." But pure water could never be a bad thing, could it?
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
There are 1 2
3 4 pages in this feature. ©2003, University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. |
|||