|
 1.
Body Map
2. Modern modification
3. Tattoo. Pierce. How come?
4. Hepatitis C
5. To regulate?

Cirrhosis is a chronic liver disease that
damages and scars liver tissue, interfering with the liver's essential
metabolic jobs. While excessive alcohol use is the leading cause
of cirrhosis, hepatitis C is another cause. Image:
National
Library of Medicine and NIH
Epping
Forest District Council |

Because tattooing and piercing both cut through
the protective surface of the skin, they risk infection. Historically,
tattoos have transmitted such pathogens as syphilis, staphylococcus,
HIV and hepatitis B. Now, there is suspicion about hepatitis C.
The
various hepatitis viruses attack the liver, and cause jaundice, fever
or even liver failure. The liver is the site of many biochemical
reactions in the body; liver failure from cirrhosis kills unless a liver transplant
is available.
Amidst the alphabet-soup that is hepatitis,
C is a particular concern. Since the pathogen was recognized in
1988, it's been shown to cause two types of problem. Acute hepatitis
syndrome includes pain in the upper right side of the body, vomiting,
and fever. Far more common is chronic, or silent, hepatitis C infection,
which may, decades later, cause cirrhosis of the liver or liver
cancer.
Chronic liver disease is the tenth largest
cause of death among U.S. adults; 40 percent to 60 percent is apparently
caused by hepatitis C.
Translated:
Hepatitis C is a big deal. But although surveys show that
1.8 percent of the American population of all ages -- and perhaps up to 5 percent of the working age populationó is infected with C, most
of those people don't know it.
In past decades, the largest source of infection was probably
blood transfusions performed before 1985, when screening of blood
donors cut C's spread. But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) says 41,000 new infections occur annually, and transfusion
is only one possible route for this blood-borne infection. Currently,
CDC thinks the largest route for hepatitis C is intravenous (IV)
drug use. But Robert Haley, an epidemiologist at University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, in Dallas, argues that about 40 percent
of infections aren't associated with IV drugs, or other known risk
factors.
Could dirty tattoo needles or other problems
with tattoo infection control be transmitting C?
Perhaps. The CDC admits that the "risk of infection
from intranasal cocaine use, tattooing, and body-piercing" are "unanswered
questions [that] significantly impact the direction of hepatitis
C prevention and control activities." That impact is unclear, however,
as the CDC's hep branch didn't find time to respond to an inquiry
from The Why Files.
But there are troubling indications that tattoos
can transmit C.
In December, 2003, a Texas jury awarded $551,600 to a
woman who had contracted hepatitis C. Her only risk factor was
getting a tattoo, and the tattoo parlor, and its employee were
found legally liable.
Researchers found more than a six-fold greater risk of
hepatitis C infection among people with tattoos in Brazil (see
"Tattooing and Transfusion-Transmitted..." in the bibliography).
The study did not find increases in hepatitis B or HIV among people
with tattoos.
When Haley and colleague Paul Fischer analyzed blood tests
from 626 patients who visited a clinic for problems not related
to hepatitis, they calculated that the odds of C infection were
6.5 times greater among people with commercial tattoos.
"Commercially acquired tattoos," Haley wrote,
"accounted for more than twice as many [hepatitis C] infections
(41 percent) as injection-drug use (17 percent)." C also became
more common with increasing tattoo size and more tattoos (see "Commercial
Tattooing as ..." in the bibliography).
This kind of "warning" is supposed
to alert tattoo artists to the danger of infection. Is art more
important than health?
These results have not changed the CDC position. "While it is possible for HCV [hepatitis C virus]
to be transmitted from any percutaneous [through the skin] exposure
to blood, exposures such as tattooing, body piercing, or acupuncture
have not been shown to place people at increased risk for infection."
Haley thinks he has an explanation for the
different interpretations. "If you get a hepatitis dose from IV
[intravenous] drug use or a transfusion, you are infusing a large
amount of virus directly into your blood stream. It goes immediately
to the liver and you get sick within weeks, turn yellow with acute
hepatitis syndrome.
"But if you get a dose of virus from tattooing,"
Haley continues, "you only get a few virus particles into your skin,
and it takes much longer to work its way through the immune system
to the liver, and you never develop acute hepatitis syndrome -- but the long-term risk for cirrhosis and liver cancer are the same."
Keep in mind that hepatitis C is largely a silent
epidemic: "80 to 90 percent of people who get hepatitis C never
get the acute syndrome," Haley adds.
CDC erred, Haley says, by investigating acute
hepatitis, but not silent infections. The agency relies for information
on a network that looks into every case of acute hepatitis syndrome
reported to local health departments in six counties. Researchers,
he says, ask patients about possible exposures, working down from
IV drugs through multiple sex partners and transfusions, until they
finally reach tattoos. But once a patient mentions exposure to a
possible risk factor, the questions stop. And since tattoos are
toward the bottom of the list, the question is seldom asked.
Who's regulating
the tat-pierce biz?
|
 |