<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Why Files &#187; microbial contamination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whyfiles.org/tag/microbial-contamination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whyfiles.org</link>
	<description>The Science Behind The News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://whyfiles.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Are there more food recalls now? Why?</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2009/are-there-more-food-recalls-now-why/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2009/are-there-more-food-recalls-now-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curiosities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E. coli bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salmonella]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=2756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2009 has been a big year for food recalls, largely because salmonella-contaminated dried milk, pistachio nuts and peanut products affected thousands of items in a wide variety of food products, says Kathleen Glass, associate director of the Food Research Institute. &#8220;If you have a single whole food, from one manufacturing plant or one farm, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2009 has been a big year for food recalls, largely because salmonella-contaminated dried milk, pistachio nuts and peanut products affected thousands of items in a wide variety of food products, says Kathleen Glass, associate director of the <a href="http://fri.wisc.edu/">Food Research Institute</a>. &#8220;If you have a single whole food, from one manufacturing plant or one farm, the contamination event will have a much smaller effect.&#8221;</p>
<p>Food recalls may well be increasing, partly due to better technology and greater awareness of the possibility for microbial contamination. &#8220;We are certainly much better at finding contamination, and there is stepped up surveillance,&#8221; says Glass, a microbiologist, but counting recalls does not prove that food is more dangerous.</p>
<p>The deadly bacterium E coli O157, for example, started appearing in hamburger about two decades ago, changes in manufacturing processes have caused it to grow less common in U.S. Department of Agriculture hamburger inspections. &#8220;But they are finding the proverbial needle in haystack,&#8221; says Glass. &#8220;While the rate of contamination has decreased, the number of ground beef recalls has increased from eight in 2006 to 20 in 2007 because more samples are surveyed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet during the same period, fewer human O157 infections have been confirmed in health laboratories, she adds. &#8220;We recall more, but are finding an overall reduced incidence of E coli in ground beef, and are also reducing the rate of lab-confirmed infections. So what interpretation can you make? That the food-safety system is working, even though the number of recalls is rising.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2009/are-there-more-food-recalls-now-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

