<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Why Files &#187; physics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whyfiles.org/tag/physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whyfiles.org</link>
	<description>The Science Behind The News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://whyfiles.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Double the bubble!</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2010/double-the-bubble/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2010/double-the-bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>svmedaristwf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Subject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Theme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 5-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 9-12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motions and forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wacky science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bubbles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serendipity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=8122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High-speed movies of popping bubbles show a ring of "daughter" bubbles forming around the edge. A close look reveals a third generation of "granddaughter" bubbles. How does this happen? Does this matter to real-world medicine and climatology? And can we get paid to play with bubbles?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Popping the bubble</h3>
<div class="box350">
<p><a href="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/wineglass_crop.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8172" title="wineglass_crop" src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/wineglass_crop.jpg" alt="A clear wine glass over sink with soap suds, large bubble inside, also a ring of tiny bubbles." width="350" height="519" /></a></p>
<div class="attrib">Courtesy <a href=" http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~jbird/">James Bird </a></div>
<div class="caption">A bubble like this broke, leaving the ring of smaller bubbles seen on the right.</div>
</div>
<p>Whether it&#8217;s beer or soap, soup or suds, bubbles are a fact of life. These evanescent but ubiquitous structures posed a perfect challenge for James Bird, who has just received his PhD from Harvard University. &#8220;Bubbles are fun, but the dynamics are fast enough that you have to use high speed cameras, and the visual aspect appeals to me,&#8221; Bird says.</p>
<p>Bubbles matter in realms ranging from medicine to climate. But until now, nobody knew that when larger bubbles break, they spawn smaller bubbles. Even stranger, as Bird and his graduate advisor Howard Stone, who is now at Princeton University, have found, these &#8220;daughter&#8221; bubbles can even spawn &#8220;granddaughter&#8221; bubbles.</p>
<p>This chain reaction only occurs when many factors, like bubble size and liquid viscosity, are correct.</p>
<p>Suitably, Bird says the bubble study arose when he and co-author Laurent Courbin were &#8220;playing in the lab late one night, trying to get a bubble to spread on different surfaces, but instead this hemispheric bubble would pop to create a ring of daughter bubbles. We looked at each other and were not sure what was going on.&#8221;</p>
<p>As Bird recalls, &#8220;Howard gave me permission to have fun and see if I could figure it out.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Tense at the surface</h3>
<p>The major physical force at work in the bubbles is surface tension &#8211; the same phenomenon that causes water to creep up the side of a glass. Surface tension occurs because smaller surfaces have lower energy, so stretchy materials like films and balloons tend to adopt a shape with the smallest area.</p>
<p>Surface tension forms spherical bubbles because spheres have the smallest area for any given volume of fluid. But surface tension also exerts pressure on the trapped gas, which explains why bubbles pop rather than just break.</p>
<div class="box200left"><a rel="attachment wp-att-8194" href="http://whyfiles.org/2010/double-the-bubble/1s_glycerol/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8194" title="1s_glycerol" src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/1s_glycerol.jpg" alt="A side view of bursting bubble, flat ridge on top slightly extended away from the film." width="200" height="200" /></a></p>
<div class="attrib">Courtesy <a href="http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~jbird/">James Bird </a></div>
<div class="caption">After a bubble breaks, the retracting liquid may form a lip that traps a donut of air. This donut is the origin of tiny &#8220;daughter bubbles&#8221; that can break and form yet another ring of &#8220;granddaughter&#8221; bubbles.</div>
</div>
<p>Using high-speed video, Stone, Bird and their colleagues popped a bubble and watched it break.  As the trapped gas rushed out, surface tension retracted the bubble film, and a lip formed around at the top. &#8220;If you apply force to something, it tends to move in straight line,&#8221; says Stone. &#8220;When the soap film pops, surface tension pulls to open the ring, so the film moves in a horizontal line at first.&#8221;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the absence of the internal pressure causes the rest of the bubble to implode.  The combination of these two motions creates a tiny lip at the top of the bursting bubble. As the bubble retracts, the lip curls over and briefly traps a donut of air around the bubble.</p>
<div class="box300"><p><a href="http://whyfiles.org/2010/double-the-bubble/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
<div class="attrib">Movies courtesy <a href="http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~jbird/">James Bird </a></div>
<div class="caption">The formation daughter bubbles is seen in simultaneous movies shot from the side and bottom. Left: at about 2.5 milliseconds (ms), a lip forms that later traps air inside an unstable, donut-shaped structure. Right: by about 10 ms, the donut has sub-divided into air bubbles.</div>
</div>
<p>From that point, says Bird, &#8220;It&#8217;s 19th century physics. The daughter bubbles form for the same reason that a faucet jet breaks up into little droplets.&#8221; Translated: The droplets have a lower energy state than the stream of water, and the daughter bubbles have a lower energy state than the donut of trapped air around the broken bubble.</p>
<h3>Chain reaction</h3>
<p>The formation of &#8220;daughter bubbles&#8221; is not the end of the story, however: when they land on the liquid, they may also break up, forming a third generation of bubbles.</p>
<p>When a bubble pops, a jet of material may rise at the center. In a big bubble, these jets remain at the surface, but the higher pressure in a tiny bubble will squirt a smidgeon of liquid, together with any associated chemicals or particles, into the air.</p>
<p>The &#8220;bubble-begets-more-bubbles&#8221; phenomenon could matter, because these jets can carry pathogens and spread disease in hot tubs or swimming pools.</p>
<p>And a ridiculous number of bubbles &#8212; between 10<sup>18</sup> and 10<sup>20 </sup> &#8212; supposedly break every second in the oceans. These bubbles can carry heat, chemicals and water vapor into the atmosphere, affecting weather and climate.</p>
<p>Computerized climate models must consider the interaction between ocean and atmosphere, which entails accounting for all these breaking bubbles, Stone says.  &#8220;If you don&#8217;t know these parameters, your model is filled with ad hoc parameters [AKA wild guesses] and you don&#8217;t even know the order of magnitude. Computer models are only as good as the parameters that go into them.&#8221;</p>
<div class="imgBigWhite"><p><a href="http://whyfiles.org/2010/double-the-bubble/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
<div class="caption">A daughter bubble created by the rupture of a larger bubble breaks, forming a jet that propels micron-sized droplets (arrows) into the air.</div>
</div>
<h3>Small is beautiful</h3>
<p>By showing how large bubbles create a cascade of smaller bubbles, the new study highlights the real-world effects of large bubbles, says Bird.  &#8220;People have discounted bubbles bigger than a few millimeters because they did not create aerosols, but we think the impact is actually much greater because the bigger bubbles are a source  of lots of little bubbles, which can make a lot of aerosols.&#8221;</p>
<p>And the answer to your inevitable last question is yes. Bird &#8220;absolutely&#8221; did play with soap bubbles as a kid.</p>
<p>David J. Tenenbaum</p>
<div class="imgBigClear"><a rel="attachment wp-att-8209" href="http://whyfiles.org/2010/double-the-bubble/bubble_monster/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-8209" title="bubble_monster" src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/bubble_monster.jpg" alt="A small baby in the bathtub covered nearly completely in small white soap bubbles" width="620" height="555" /></a></p>
<div class="attrib">Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/audiinsperation/1492042458/">audi_insperation </a></div>
<div class="caption">To young people, bubbles are nearly irresistible!</div>
</div>
<div id="relateds">
<h3>Bibliography</h3>
<p>Daughter bubble cascades produced by folding of ruptured thin films, James C. Bird et al, Nature, Vol 465, 10 June 2010|<br />
/doi:10.1038/nature09069</p>
<h3>Related Why Files</h3>
<p><a href="http://whyfiles.org/2009/pop-goes-the-super-supernova/">Pop goes</a> the supernova.</p>
<p>How do <a href="http://whyfiles.org/273crystal/">snowflakes form</a>?</p>
<p><a href="http://whyfiles.org/shorties/133quantum_leap/">Quantum</a> connection.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2010/double-the-bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/bubble_movie3.mov" length="1734740" type="video/quicktime" />
<enclosure url="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/bubble_movie2.mov" length="1450351" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hit a home run</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2010/hit-a-home-run/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2010/hit-a-home-run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interactives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/2010/hit-a-home-run/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whack that baseball! When you hit a baseball, speed, angle and air resistance all affect how far it travels. Balls hit too low quickly return to Earth; balls hit too high travel a long way vertically, but not far horizontally. Can you find the &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; where horizontal travel is greatest. Can you find the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Whack that baseball!</strong><br />
When you hit a baseball, speed, angle and air resistance all affect how far it travels. Balls hit too low quickly return to Earth; balls hit too high travel a long way vertically, but not far horizontally. Can you find the &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; where horizontal travel is greatest. Can you find the best angle?</p>
<p>Air resistance absorbs kinetic energy from the ball, slowing it. A slow-moving ball has less travel time before gravity pulls it back to Earth. Change air resistance by choosing a different stadium location.</p>
<div class="imgBigClear">
<applet name="applet" codebase="/wp-content/" code="Homerun.class" archive="homerun.jar" width="425" height="296" alt="You must have Java enabled on your computer to view this applet">
</div>
<div id="relateds">
<p>
Applet and illustrations copyright (C) 2003 Tom Whittaker, S.V. Medaris, and Steve Ackerman. The Motion-W® and Bucky Badger® logos are trademarks of the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2010/hit-a-home-run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s behind the claims that the new particle accelerator in Europe may create black holes that could destroy the Earth? Should we be worried?</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2008/whats-behind-the-claims-that-the-new-particle-accelerator-in-europe-may-create-black-holes-that-could-destroy-the-earth-should-we-be-worried/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2008/whats-behind-the-claims-that-the-new-particle-accelerator-in-europe-may-create-black-holes-that-could-destroy-the-earth-should-we-be-worried/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curiosities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hadron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=2179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the Large Hadron Collider starts running this summer near Geneva, Switzerland, some physicists have predicted that some of its high-energy proton collisions could produce microscopic black holes. Concerned about the ramifications of such black holes, two men filed a lawsuit in March in Hawaii contending that safety concerns have been inadequately addressed at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the <a href="http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/">Large Hadron Collider</a> starts running this summer near Geneva, Switzerland, some physicists have predicted that some of its high-energy proton collisions could produce microscopic black holes. Concerned about the ramifications of such black holes, two men filed a lawsuit in March in Hawaii contending that safety concerns have been inadequately addressed at the facility.</p>
<p>But even if miniature black holes were created — a scenario UW-Madison physicist <a href="http://www.hep.wisc.edu/wsmith/">Wesley Smith</a> calls unlikely — they would be too weak to cause any trouble and would vanish almost immediately.</p>
<p>&#8220;When you try to swat a mosquito by clapping your hands together, you create more energy at that moment than we do in one collision,” says Smith, who is involved in the experiments.</p>
<p>Since a black hole&#8217;s gravitational pull is related to its energy, these hypothetical tiny objects would have too little energy to drag anything in.</p>
<p>In addition, he says, similar particle collisions are happening all the time in nature, as high-energy cosmic rays bombard Earth and its atmosphere. &#8220;If there were black holes being made that are dangerous to the Earth, we wouldn’t be here.”</p>
<p>Despite rigorous scientific and safety reviews, there is no evidence to suggest any cause for concern. &#8220;It’s a case of people who understand a few things about physics, but not what’s really going on,” Smith says. &#8220;None of the people who understand the physics of what’s going on have any concerns whatsoever and find all this rather amusing.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2008/whats-behind-the-claims-that-the-new-particle-accelerator-in-europe-may-create-black-holes-that-could-destroy-the-earth-should-we-be-worried/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spallation Neutron Source: Scientist’s Tool</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2003/spallation-neutron-source/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2003/spallation-neutron-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2003 21:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>schulte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Subject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Theme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 5-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 9-12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactions of energy and matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Properties in matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structure of atoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structures and properties of matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer of energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoff Greene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linear accelerator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membrane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutrino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oak Ridge National Laboratory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Briber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spallation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thom Mason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Spallation Neutron Source, a mammoth science project involving the collaboration of six national laboratories, is scheduled to be completed 2006.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neutron source is a handy gadget for material science, biology, engineering.<span id="more-807"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2003/spallation-neutron-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Particles Get Entangled: Weird Quantum Interaction</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2003/particles-get-entangled/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2003/particles-get-entangled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>schulte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brains & computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Subject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Theme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 5-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 9-12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motions and forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Properties in matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structures and properties of matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Saffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markus Aspelmeyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spy spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Wisconsin Madison UW-Madison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Austrian researchers show quantum entanglement across the Danube River, providing new promise in cryptography and computing. At the smallest scale, you can throw out the usual rules of engagement. What's up with spooky action at a distance?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the smallest scale, you can throw out the usual rules of engagement. What&#8217;s up with &#8220;spooky action at a distance?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2003/particles-get-entangled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baseball Science</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2002/baseball-science/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2002/baseball-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2002 20:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>schulte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Subject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Theme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disease and Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 5-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 9-12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal and community health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science in Personal and Social Perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wacky science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gregory Hartig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral mouth cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Ackerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teach mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Achtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Zapotocny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Wisconsin Madison UW-Madison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Throw a curve ball. Evade the rainstorm. And don't get mouth cancer. It's all in an afternoon's ball game.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curve balls, high flies, thin air, and of course, chawin&#8217; tobacco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2002/baseball-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Violin Physics Explained</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2001/violin-physics/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2001/violin-physics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>schulte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts & Humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Subject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 5-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 9-12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motions and forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Gough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isaac Stern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saw-tooth wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timbre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How violins make sound. And why the ear is the world's most sophisticated spectrum analyzer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[How violins make sound. And why the ear is the world's most sophisticated spectrum analyzer.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2001/violin-physics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sand Castles</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/1997/sand-castles/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/1997/sand-castles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 1997 18:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>schulte</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Subject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 5-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 9-12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physical Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Properties in matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structures and properties of matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Schiffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sand castle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does damp sand hold the shape of a container after you dump it out? Sand + water = physics!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does damp sand magically hold the shape of a yogurt container after you dump it out?<span id="more-736"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/1997/sand-castles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

