<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Why Files &#187; meteorology weather</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whyfiles.org/tag/weather/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whyfiles.org</link>
	<description>The Science Behind The News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://whyfiles.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Let it snow</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2012/let-it-snow/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2012/let-it-snow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool Science Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorology weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snowflake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=22282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you saw something like this falling from the sky, you might think that the weather outside was indeed frightful. But this dumbbell shaped object is, in fact, a super-magnified snowflake &#8212; yes, a snowflake. Not so frightful after all. This particular snowflake is a capped column, one of many types of snowflakes. The fuzzy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br clear="all"><br />
<div id="attachment_22289" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/snowflake8.jpg"><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/snowflake8-500x356.jpg" alt="Dumbbell shaped object with fuzz-like texture on its two hexagon-shaped ends" title="A capped column snowflake with a collection of rime" width="500" height="356" class="size-medium wp-image-22289" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A capped column snowflake with a collection of rime</p></div></p>
<p>
If you saw something like this falling from the sky, you might think that the weather outside was indeed frightful. But this dumbbell shaped object is, in fact, a super-magnified snowflake &#8212; yes, a snowflake. Not so frightful after all.</p>
<p>This particular snowflake is a capped column, one of <a href="http://www.its.caltech.edu/~atomic/snowcrystals/class/class.htm">many types</a> of snowflakes. The fuzzy texture on its two hexagonal ends is called rime. </p>
<p>Sometimes, when a snowflake, or snow crystal, passes through a cloud on its way down to earth, it collides with super-cold water droplets—clouds, after all, are just a bunch of coalesced drops of water. This collision causes the cloud&#8217;s water droplets to freeze and stick to the surface of the snow crystal. When these frozen droplets accumulate on the crystal&#8217;s surface, the snowflake becomes bedecked with rime.</p>
<p>If a snow crystal collects too much rime, its original identity can be obscured. Snowflakes that experience this type of identity crisis are called graupel.</p>
<p>This snowflake&#8217;s portrait was taken by a <a href="http://emu.arsusda.gov/snowsite/4100/4100.html">low temperature scanning electron microscope</a>.</p>
<p><em><strong>Photo: <a href="http://emu.arsusda.gov/snowsite/rimegraupel/rg.html">Electron and Confocal Microscopy Laboratory</a>, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2012/let-it-snow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tornado prediction</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2011/tornado-prediction/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2011/tornado-prediction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 20:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>svmedaristwf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Subject]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[By Theme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth & Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth and Space Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy in the earth system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 5-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grades 9-12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather & Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate climatology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joplin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorology weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thunderstorm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tornado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tornado Alley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Wisconsin Madison UW-Madison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=16549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tornadoes need wet air, dry air, and wind shear. What explains the big improvement in tornado prediction? Is climate change boosting these storms?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Joplin, Missouri in ruins</h3>
<p> The death toll from the May 22, 2011 tornado in Joplin – now 122 &#8212; is the latest tragedy of a horrific year for tornadoes.  On April 27, twisters in Alabama and nearby states killed 314, the fourth highest in U.S. history.  The 480 deaths in 2011 are already the highest number since 1953, and tornado season continues through mid-August.</p>
<div class="imgBigBlack">
<h3>Joplin, MO after the May 22, 2011 tornado</h3>
<p>
<ul id="gallery"> 

<!-- 1 -->	
<li><span class="panel-overlay">
<div class="attrib">Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/komunews/5755900671/">KOMU News</a></div></span><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/01slide_joplin.jpg" alt="" /></li> 

<!-- 2 -->	
<li><span class="panel-overlay">
<div class="attrib">Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/komunews/5756446198/">KOMU News</a></div></span><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/02slide_joplin.jpg" alt=" " /></li> 

<!-- 3 -->	
<li><span class="panel-overlay">
<div class="attrib">Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/komunews/5756447472/">KOMU News</a></div></span><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/03slide_joplin.jpg" alt=" " /></li> 
</ul>

</p></div>
<p>The Why Files asked Jonathan Martin, an expert on the large atmospheric disturbances that form tornadoes, some questions about tornado prediction.  We edited the answers of Martin, a professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, after the interview.</p>
<div class="twf"><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/twf_bullet.gif" alt="" title="" width="55" height="20" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-16636" /><strong>The Why Files:</strong> What must we know to make a good tornado prediction?</div>
<div class="researcher">
<p><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tornado_bullet.gif" alt="" title="" width="50" height="20" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-16660" /> <strong>Jonathan Martin:</strong> Tornado prediction is based on understanding the essential ingredients that are coming into play to forecast the storms that can produce tornadoes:</p>
<p>
1. A very strong jet stream, which provides the necessary vertical wind shear &#8212; an increase of wind speed with height. This wind shear is what starts the funnel rotating.</p>
<p>
2. A substantial amount of water vapor, especially in the lower troposphere.  When this moisture condenses, it releases most of the energy that drives the storm &#8212; acting rather like a steam engine.</p>
<p>
3. Warm, dry air at middle altitudes. In Tornado Alley, this air comes off the Mexican plateau and puts a lid on the warm, moist air building in the lower atmosphere. In the Southern plains, solar energy almost literally cooks the water vapor, but the cap prevents gradual release of this energy.  Then, suddenly, an explosive thunderstorm occurs out of the blue sky and starts to release this energy, which is the source of power for the convective storms that create thunder, lightning and tornadoes.</p>
</div>
<div class="imgBigClear">
<a href="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tornado_structure.jpg">
<div class="enlarge">ENLARGE</div>
<p><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tornado_structure.jpg" alt="Illustration of large cloud; arrows show air flows converging into a twisting funnel" title="This diagram shows how air flows converge to create a tornado." width="620 height="324" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-16670" /></a></p>
<div class="attrib">Photo: <a href="http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/599941/tornado">Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.</a></div>
<div class="caption">This diagram shows how air flows converge to create a tornado.</div>
</div>
<div class="twf"><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/twf_bullet.gif" alt="" title="" width="55" height="20" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-16636" /><strong>The Why Files:</strong> Are predictions getting more accurate?</div>
<div class="researcher">
<p><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tornado_bullet.gif" alt="" title="" width="50" height="20" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-16660" /> <strong>Martin:</strong> Yes. The ability to predict the likelihood of tornadoes has improved, especially in the one-two day range.  We can say with fair confidence, &#8220;This wide area of Iowa is likely to be under the gun for tornadic storms, although they won&#8217;t occur everywhere in this area.&#8221;</p>
<div class="box300"><a href="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tornado3.jpg">
<div class="enlarge">ENLARGE</div>
<p><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tornado3.jpg" alt="Massive storm cloud and funnel cloud touching down on grayed landscape" title="This tornado tore through Seymour, Texas on April 19, 1979." width="300" height="200" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-16666" /></a></p>
<div class="attrib">Photo: <a href="http://www.photolib.noaa.gov/htmls/nssl0066.htm">NOAA</a>; OAR/ERL/National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL)</div>
<div class="caption">This tornado tore through Seymour, Texas on April 19, 1979.</div>
</div>
<p>Such two-day forecast were available 10 years ago, but they did not garner much attention, because they were not that good. It&#8217;s interesting that most of this year&#8217;s major outbreaks have been forecast more than one day in advance.</p>
<p>
 Once the predicted day arrives, the emphasis shifts to monitoring with satellites and radar. We spent $4 billion networking the country with Doppler radar in the 1980s; this was a fantastic investment that has saved 10,000 lives, at a minimum. Last Sunday, radar is what gave people in Joplin the warning: &#8220;You have X minutes to find cover.&#8221; Undoubtedly that saved lives; Joplin could have been even worse.</p>
<p>
  Those three critical elements come in endless varieties and circumstances, and that&#8217;s where expertise comes into play: &#8220;How will today&#8217;s vertical wind shear, heat and humidity, and capping play out in terms of tornadoes?&#8221;</p>
<p>
  For short-term predictions, we are trying to understand exactly how a severe thunderstorm produces tornadoes. We have several viable theories, but they need to be tested more thoroughly. Still, predicting a tornado at a specific location several hours in advance is not something we can do. We may never be able to do this, but it may not be necessary, given the other improvements in prediction and warning.</p>
</div>
<div class="imgBigClear">
<a href="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/apr2011_tornactivity.jpg">
<div class="enlarge">ENLARGE</div>
<p><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/apr2011_tornactivity.jpg" alt="Bar graph of April 1950 to 2011, 2011 has highest tornado count at about 875" title="Preliminary counts show about 875 twisters in April, 2011, the most since 1950. NOAA expects to issue a final count in a couple of months." width="620" height="466" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-16687" /></a></p>
<div class="attrib">Graphic: <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/tornadoes/">NOAA</a></div>
<div class="caption">Preliminary counts show about 875 twisters in April, 2011, the most since 1950. NOAA expects to issue a final count in a couple of months.</div>
</div>
<div class="twf"><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/twf_bullet.gif" alt="" title="" width="55" height="20" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-16636" /><strong>The Why Files:</strong> Why so much damage and death this year? Is this a result of climate change?</div>
<div class="researcher">
<p><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tornado_bullet.gif" alt="" title="" width="50" height="20" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-16660" /><strong>Martin:</strong><br />
This tornado season is by no means over, and we are already at about 1,200 tornadoes, twice the average for this date. I&#8217;d guess we are not running at twice the level of EF 5 [the most intense tornadoes], but we have had the great misfortune that several of the 5s have hit heavily populated areas like Tuscaloosa and Joplin. That&#8217;s somewhat unusual, although it may be purely random.</p>
<p>
  The question we are asked is whether an increase in tornado intensity can be attributed to global warming. For the longest time, I said these are very small-scale disturbances, but I am beginning to think there is a link.  Earth is warming, there can be no skepticism about that, and that may have a significant impact on the interaction between tropical circulation and temperate-zone circulation that is likely to form tornadoes in the central United States.</p>
<p>
  Warm areas near the equator in the western Pacific energize the spring jet stream, which flows to the middle latitudes and influences severe spring weather in Tornado Alley. For Tuscaloosa, Ala. on April 27, there is clear  evidence that a precursor disturbance some days ahead in the far western equatorial Pacific had a significant and obvious hand in shaping the jet stream all the way to the Southeast, and was a big ingredient in producing these tornadoes. This is getting us beyond the vague notion that warming must be increasing the number of storms, and allows us to hang our hat on a particular  kind of interaction, and test to see if it&#8217;s accurate.</p>
</p></div>
<div id="date"> &#8212; David J. Tenenbaum</div>
<div class="relateds">
<div style="display: none;">
<a class="simple-footnote" title="National Severe Storms Laboratory." id="return-note-16549-1" href="#note-16549-1"><sup>1</sup></a><br />
<a class="simple-footnote" title="National Climatic Data Center on tornados." id="return-note-16549-2" href="#note-16549-2"><sup>2</sup></a><br />
<a class="simple-footnote" title="Interviews with NOAA experts on April 2011 tornado outbreak." id="return-note-16549-3" href="#note-16549-3"><sup>3</sup></a><br />
<a class="simple-footnote" title="2011 tornado info." id="return-note-16549-4" href="#note-16549-4"><sup>4</sup></a><br />
<a class="simple-footnote" title="F5 tornados of the U.S." id="return-note-16549-5" href="#note-16549-5"><sup>5</sup></a><br />
<a class="simple-footnote" title="Joplin, MO Q &amp; A." id="return-note-16549-6" href="#note-16549-6"><sup>6</sup></a><br />
<a class="simple-footnote" title="Interactive map: deadliest tornado years." id="return-note-16549-7" href="#note-16549-7"><sup>7</sup></a><br />
<a class="simple-footnote" title="Tornado basics." id="return-note-16549-8" href="#note-16549-8"><sup>8</sup></a><br />
<a class="simple-footnote" title="Tornado encyclopedia entry." id="return-note-16549-9" href="#note-16549-9"><sup>9</sup></a><br />
<a class="simple-footnote" title="Animation of 2011 tornado satellite imagery." id="return-note-16549-10" href="#note-16549-10"><sup>10</sup></a><br />
<a class="simple-footnote" title="Climate change could spawnmore tornados." id="return-note-16549-11" href="#note-16549-11"><sup>11</sup></a><br />
<a class="simple-footnote" title="Deadliest tornado season, but why?" id="return-note-16549-12" href="#note-16549-12"><sup>12</sup></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="relateds"><h3>Terry Devitt, editor; S.V. Medaris, designer/illustrator; David J. Tenenbaum, feature writer; Amy Toburen, content development executive; Molly Simis, project assistant</h3></div>
<div class="simple-footnotes"><h3>Bibliography</h3><ol><li id="note-16549-1"><a href="http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/">National Severe Storms Laboratory</a>. <a href="#return-note-16549-1">&#8617;</a></li><li id="note-16549-2"><a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/tornadoes/">National Climatic Data Center</a> on tornados. <a href="#return-note-16549-2">&#8617;</a></li><li id="note-16549-3"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/NOAAWP#p/c/CFE1C624F9360379/14/KGNp56W-jDY">Interviews with NOAA experts</a> on April 2011 tornado outbreak. <a href="#return-note-16549-3">&#8617;</a></li><li id="note-16549-4"><a href="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/2011_tornado_information.html">2011 tornado info</a>. <a href="#return-note-16549-4">&#8617;</a></li><li id="note-16549-5"><a href="http://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/f5torns.html">F5 tornados of the U.S</a>. <a href="#return-note-16549-5">&#8617;</a></li><li id="note-16549-6"><a href="http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/your-questions-on-joplin-mo-and-the-seasons-storms/?scp=4&#038;sq=alabama%20tornado%20death%20toll&#038;st=cse">Joplin, MO</a> Q &#038; A. <a href="#return-note-16549-6">&#8617;</a></li><li id="note-16549-7"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/04/28/us/tornado-deaths.html">Interactive map</a>: deadliest tornado years. <a href="#return-note-16549-7">&#8617;</a></li><li id="note-16549-8"><a href="http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/primer/tornado/tor_basics.html">Tornado basics</a>. <a href="#return-note-16549-8">&#8617;</a></li><li id="note-16549-9">Tornado <a href="http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/599941/tornado">encyclopedia entry</a>. <a href="#return-note-16549-9">&#8617;</a></li><li id="note-16549-10">Animation of 2011 tornado <a href="http://www.nnvl.noaa.gov/MediaDetail.php?MediaID=731&#038;MediaTypeID=2">satellite imagery</a>. <a href="#return-note-16549-10">&#8617;</a></li><li id="note-16549-11">Climate change could spawn<a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2011/04/tornadoes-severe-weather-climate-change-global-warming/1">more tornados</a>. <a href="#return-note-16549-11">&#8617;</a></li><li id="note-16549-12">Deadliest tornado season, <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/05/23/eveningnews/main20065478.shtml">but why</a>? <a href="#return-note-16549-12">&#8617;</a></li></ol></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2011/tornado-prediction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Madison, Wisconsin in a snow belt? What is the origin of the term?</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2010/is-madison-wisconsin-in-a-snow-belt-what-is-the-origin-of-the-term/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2010/is-madison-wisconsin-in-a-snow-belt-what-is-the-origin-of-the-term/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[February]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[January]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather Guys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorology weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/2010/is-madison-wisconsin-in-a-snow-belt-what-is-the-origin-of-the-term/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Madison, Wisconsin in a snow belt? What is the origin of the term? While the lakes around Madison provide many winter recreation activities, the local lakes do not yield a snow belt. Map by Pierre cb We refer to agricultural regions in the United States as ‘belts’, such as the cotton belt and wheat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Is Madison, Wisconsin in a snow belt? What is the origin of the term?</h3>
<p>While the lakes around Madison provide many winter recreation activities, the local lakes do not yield a snow belt.</p>
<div class="box300">
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Great_Lakes_Snowbelt_EPA_fr.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5237" title="snowbelt" src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/snowbelt.jpg" alt="map showing snowbelt regions around the Great Lakes" width="300" height="239" /></a></p>
<div class="attrib">Map by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Great_Lakes_Snowbelt_EPA_fr.png">Pierre cb</a></div>
</div>
<p>We refer to agricultural regions in the United States as ‘belts’, such as the cotton belt and wheat belt. This phrase has expanded to cultural (e.g. bible) and climatic regions. The &#8220;snow belt” refers to the area downwind of the Great Lakes where the climate includes large amounts of snowfall.</p>
<p>The snow belt exists because snowfall can be enhanced when storms cross large lakes, called the &#8220;lake effect.” When cold air moves across a large expanse of warmer lake water, the lower air is warmed and moistened by the water. This enhanced evaporation increases the moisture content of the air mass; this moisture can then precipitate as snow downwind.</p>
<p>The distance the air mass travels over the water, called the fetch, is important in generating snowfall.  Generally, larger fetches give more time for the air mass to accumulate moisture, producing more snowfall. A minimum fetch of about 60 miles is needed for lake effect snowfall. Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania and New York all have major snow belts downwind of Lakes Superior, Erie and Ontario.</p>
<div id="relateds">
<p>
Steven A. Ackerman and Jonathan Martin are professors in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at UW-Madison, are guests on the <a href="http://www.wpr.org/larrymeiller/">Larry Meiller</a>&#8216;s WHA-AM radio show the last Monday of each month at 11:45 a.m.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2010/is-madison-wisconsin-in-a-snow-belt-what-is-the-origin-of-the-term/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch for steam devils in late November/early December</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2010/watch-for-steam-devils-in-late-novemberearly-december/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2010/watch-for-steam-devils-in-late-novemberearly-december/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[January]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[November]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather Guys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorology weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steam devil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/2010/watch-for-steam-devils-in-late-novemberearly-december/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch for steam devils in late November/early December Steam Devils in Wisconsin One of the many advantages of living near large lakes in temperate climates is the steam fog that shrouds them in fall and early winter. Fog is essentially a ground-hugging cloud, composed of tiny liquid water droplets. Steam fog will develop at this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Watch for steam devils in late November/early December</h3>
<div class="box300">
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuXK_tTq2lg"><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/steam_devil_video_still.jpg" alt="steam devil over lake" title="steam_devil_video_still" width="300" height="270" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-12139" /></a>
<div class="attrib"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuXK_tTq2lg">Steam Devils in Wisconsin</a></div>
</div>
<p>One of the many advantages of living near large lakes in temperate climates is the steam fog that shrouds them in fall and early winter.  Fog is essentially a ground-hugging cloud, composed of tiny liquid water droplets. </p>
<p>Steam fog will develop at this time of year if the air above the lake has very low relative humidity, and a lot of lake water evaporates into invisible water vapor.  The more vapor in the air, the closer the air comes to being saturated. When the air finally becomes saturated, some of the vapor begins to condense into liquid water and the steam fog begins to form.  </p>
<p>When there is a large difference in temperature between the air and the water at the lake surface, there will also be considerable turbulence in the air over the lake. When a strong cold front passes through, strong winds will carry cold air toward us, and the combination of steam fog production, turbulence over the lake, and strong background winds can create one of nature’s most awesome spectacles – steam devils. </p>
<p>Steam devils are swirling columns of steam fog (analogous to dust devils) that can look like tornadoes of steam fog on a windy, cold winter day. Though it can be physically taxing due to the cold, if you ever have a chance to watch steam devils parade across a cold, watery lake, do not pass it up!</p>
<div id="relateds">
<p>
Steven A. Ackerman and Jonathan Martin are professors in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at UW-Madison, are guests on the <a href="http://www.wpr.org/larrymeiller/">Larry Meiller</a>&#8216;s WHA-AM radio show the last Monday of each month at 11:45 a.m.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2010/watch-for-steam-devils-in-late-novemberearly-december/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When does winter really start in Wisconsin?</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2010/when-does-winter-really-start-in-wisconsin/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2010/when-does-winter-really-start-in-wisconsin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[December]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[November]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather Guys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorology weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/2010/when-does-winter-really-start-in-wisconsin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When does winter really start in Wisconsin? Photo: MODIS Image Gallery by Liam Gumley, SSEC (Space Science and Engineering Center, UW, Madison). State outline barely visible under snowcover (click image to enlarge), this is Winter in Wisconsin. The beginning of astronomical winter doesn’t occur until the Winter Solstice, which is usually between December 20-22. On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>When does winter really start in Wisconsin?</h3>
<div class="box300right"><a href="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/wisconsin_winter.jpg"><img src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/wisconsin_winter.jpg" alt="wisconsin state outline barely visibl under snow cover" title="wisconsin_winter" width="300" height="251" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-12074" /></a></p>
<div class="attrib">
Photo: <a href="http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~gumley/modis_gallery/">MODIS Image Gallery</a> by Liam Gumley, <a href="http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/">SSEC (Space Science and Engineering Center, UW, Madison)</a>.</div>
<div class="caption">State outline barely visible under snowcover (click image to enlarge), this is Winter in Wisconsin.</div>
</div>
<p>The beginning of astronomical winter doesn’t occur until the Winter Solstice, which is usually between December 20-22.  On the winter solstice, the sun reaches is most southern point in the sky and our daytime hours reach an annual minimum as the nighttime hours reach an annual maximum.  </p>
<p>This is the most recognizable definition of the beginning of winter, but it rarely coincides with an abrupt plunge into the season.  In fact, anyone who has lived in the Upper Midwest or the interior of Canada knows that winter usually seems to arrive at least a month before late December.  </p>
<p>In Madison, Wisconsin, we usually have had a measurable snow, a day with morning low temperatures in the single digits, and plenty of skating long before the winter solstice.  In fact, the all-time record daily snowfall total occurred weeks before the solstice in 1991! </p>
<p>A more meaningful definition of the beginning of winter might be based on when, on average, precipitation has an equal chance of falling as rain or snow. For Madison, that day is November 15.  Of course, since this is an average (calculated over many years) any individual year may completely ignore this pattern. </p>
<p>Statistics, after all, apply to groups, not individuals.</p>
<div id="relateds">
<p>
Steven A. Ackerman and Jonathan Martin are professors in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at UW-Madison, are guests on the <a href="http://www.wpr.org/larrymeiller/">Larry Meiller</a>&#8216;s WHA-AM radio show the last Monday of each month at 11:45 a.m.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2010/when-does-winter-really-start-in-wisconsin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the difference between a &#8216;warning&#8217; and a &#8216;watch&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2010/what-is-the-difference-between-a-warning-and-a-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2010/what-is-the-difference-between-a-warning-and-a-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weather Guys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorology weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/2010/what-is-the-difference-between-a-%e2%80%98warning%e2%80%99-and-a-%e2%80%98watch%e2%80%99/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the difference between a &#8216;warning&#8217; and a &#8216;watch&#8217;? A weather watch indicates the possibility of hazardous weather, while a warning means that hazardous weather is occurring, is about to occur or is very likely to occur. A watch is intended to provide people with enough time to set safety plans in motion for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>What is the difference between a &#8216;warning&#8217; and a &#8216;watch&#8217;?</h3>
<p>A weather watch indicates the possibility of hazardous weather, while a warning means that hazardous weather is occurring, is about to occur or is very likely to occur.</p>
<p>A watch is intended to provide people with enough time to set safety plans in motion for possible hazardous weather. A warning indicates that conditions pose a threat to life or property and people in the warning area should take appropriate protective action.</p>
<div class="box200"><a href="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/severe_radar.jpg"><img title="severe weather radar" src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/severe_radar.jpg" alt="weather radar with green, red, blue zones" width="200" height="119" /></a></div>
<p>Watches and warnings outline areas where the weather may occur. Pinpointing the location of hazardous weather in advance is extremely difficult. For this reason, watches are usually issued for large regions, sometimes covering several states. Warnings are issued for much smaller areas, often only a county or two, because they are based on actual observations of hazardous weather.</p>
<p>The National Weather Service issues weather watches and warnings under specific weather conditions. A severe thunderstorm watch means that conditions are favorable for the development of severe thunderstorms in and near the watch area. A warning means that a severe thunderstorm has been sighted visually or indicated by radar and it is producing hail 0.75 inch or larger in diameter and/or winds of at least 58 mph.</p>
<p>Finally, a weather advisory may be issued when actual or expected weather conditions are not hazardous, but may cause inconvenience or concern.</p>
<div id="relateds">
<p>
Steven A. Ackerman and Jonathan Martin are professors in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at UW-Madison, are guests on the <a href="http://www.wpr.org/larrymeiller/">Larry Meiller</a>&#8216;s WHA-AM radio show the last Monday of each month at 11:45 a.m.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2010/what-is-the-difference-between-a-warning-and-a-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are clouds white?</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2010/why-are-clouds-white/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2010/why-are-clouds-white/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[April]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[August]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[February]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[January]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[November]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[September]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather Guys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cumulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorology weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/2010/why-are-clouds-white/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are clouds white? Photograph of Cumulus clouds in fair weather taken by Michael Jastremsk Clouds are made of water and clean water is clear. So why are clouds white? Because clouds are made of billions of small water droplets and ice crystals. When light beams interact with particles suspended in air, some of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Why are clouds white?</h3>
<div class="box250right"><a href="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/clouds.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-7015" title="clouds" src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/clouds-250x188.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="188" /></a></p>
<div class="attrib">Photograph of Cumulus clouds in fair weather taken by <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cumulus_clouds_in_fair_weather.jpeg">Michael Jastremsk</a></div>
</div>
<p>Clouds are made of water and clean water is clear. So why are clouds white? Because clouds are made of billions of small water droplets and ice crystals.</p>
<p>When light beams interact with particles suspended in air, some of the energy is scattered, which means the light beam changes direction, and usually color as well.  The amount of light scattered is a function of the size of the particle relative to the wavelength of light falling on it. Cloud particles are large enough to scatter any color of light that falls on them. The repeated scattering of light, called multiple scattering, causes whitish light because enough light of all colors is scattered to your eye, and those colors combine to make white light.</p>
<p>You can demonstrate this with a glass bottle. Without the labels, the glass will look clear. Wrap the bottle in a rag, smash it, and pour the small pieces into a pile. The pile will be whitish, even though each tiny piece is clear.</p>
<p>The bottoms of even the whitest clouds appear gray, sometimes ominously so. Why? Because multiple scattering above the cloud base redirects the incoming sunlight out the top and the sides of the cloud, leaving very little light to emerge from the cloud base, which is dark.</p>
<div id="relateds">
<p>
Steven A. Ackerman and Jonathan Martin are professors in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at UW-Madison, are guests on the <a href="http://www.wpr.org/larrymeiller/">Larry Meiller</a>&#8216;s WHA-AM radio show the last Monday of each month at 11:45 a.m.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2010/why-are-clouds-white/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does a 60 percent chance of precipitation mean?</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2010/what-does-a-60-percent-chance-of-precipitation-mean/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2010/what-does-a-60-percent-chance-of-precipitation-mean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[April]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[August]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[February]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[January]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[November]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[September]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather Guys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorology weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[possibility of precipitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather forecast prediction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/2010/what-does-a-60-percent-chance-of-precipitation-mean/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does a 60 percent chance of precipitation mean? The probability of precipitation (fondly known as PoP) has been part of weather forecasts since the late 1960s, and is the only forecast element that includes a probability. Unfortunately, there is confusion about the exact meaning of a &#8220;60 percent chance of precipitation.” Part of that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>What does a 60 percent chance of precipitation mean?</h3>
<p>The probability of precipitation (fondly known as PoP) has been part of weather forecasts since the late 1960s, and is the only forecast element that includes a probability. Unfortunately, there is confusion about the exact meaning of a &#8220;60 percent chance of precipitation.” Part of that confusion, we are sad to say, reflects discrepancies in interpretation and application among meteorologists.</p>
<div class="box350"><a href="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/prob_of_precip.gif"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7935" title="prob_of_precip" src="http://whyfiles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/prob_of_precip.gif" alt="" width="350" height="176" /></a></div>
<p>First, let’s understand what a PoP does not mean: It is not the percent of time precipitation will be observed over the area. Nor is it the percentage of meteorologists who believe precipitation will fall!</p>
<p>The definition most commonly among meteorologists is this the confidence probability that at least one one-hundredth inch of liquid-equivalent precipitation will fall in a single spot. One common way to grasp a PoP of 60 percent is this:  If we had ten tomorrows with identical weather conditions, rain would fall on six of them at a given point, or 60 percent of the days.  Just as importantly, rain would not fall on four of those days.</p>
<p>But this PoP is a forecast for ten potential tomorrows, not a forecast for the next ten days.  Although this may be confusing, weather forecasters have no problem thinking of tomorrow’s weather as a group of potential tomorrows. One thing you can take to the bank: as the PoP increases, precipitation becomes more likely.</p>
<div id="relateds">
<p>
Steven A. Ackerman and Jonathan Martin are professors in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at UW-Madison, are guests on the <a href="http://www.wpr.org/larrymeiller/">Larry Meiller</a>&#8216;s WHA-AM radio show the last Monday of each month at 11:45 a.m.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2010/what-does-a-60-percent-chance-of-precipitation-mean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Make rainbows!</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2010/make-rainbows/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2010/make-rainbows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interactives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorology weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainbow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=4232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rainbows are one of the wonders of the natural world: But why do you sometimes see one rainbow, and other times a double? Why do you always see rainbows with your back to the sun? How do they really work? Operate your own rainbow, then find out! OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS: CHOOSE YOUR &#8216;BOW: • Primary shows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rainbows are one of the wonders of the natural world: But why do you sometimes see one rainbow, and other times a double? Why do you always see rainbows with your back to the sun? How do they really work?</p>
<p>Operate your own rainbow, then find out!</p>
<div class="imgBigClear">
<applet name="applet" codebase="/wp-content/" code="Rainbows.class" archive="rainbows.jar" width="100%" height="450" alt="You must have Java enabled on your computer to view this applet">
</div>
<p>OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS:<br />
CHOOSE YOUR &#8216;BOW:<br />
• <strong>Primary</strong> shows the primary rainbow and its light rays.</p>
<p>• <strong>Secondary</strong> shows the secondary &#8216;bow and its light rays. Notice this bow is seen from different places on the ground; some observers can see a primary, but not a secondary, or vice versa. Lucky people can see both rainbows.</p>
<p>• <strong>To see both</strong> &#8216;bows (but no light rays), uncheck both rainbow boxes in Rain Curtain Mode.</p>
<p>PICK YOUR MODE:<br />
<strong>• Rain Curtain mode</strong> shows parallel light rays from the sun refracting and reflecting from raindrops at the top and bottom of the rain curtain. Outgoing beams show where the rainbow is visible.</p>
<p><strong>• Multi-drop mode</strong> shows three light rays refracting from three raindrops at different altitudes. The color you see depends on the angle of refraction.</p>
<p><strong>• Single-drop mode </strong>shows the path inside one drop. Change from primary to secondary to see how the light takes a different path for each rainbow. A secondary rainbow is reflected twice, so it&#8217;s dimmer.</p>
<p>DRAG YOUR OBJECTS:<br />
<strong>• Drag the sun-like object</strong> (top and right side) to change the angle of the light rays. This changes the time of day.<br />
<strong>• Drag the humanoid object</strong> to see how distance from the rain affects rainbow<br />
location in the sky.<br />
<strong>• In multi-drop mode, drag raindrops</strong> up and down to see how altitude affects viewing on the ground.</p>
<div id="relateds">
<p>
Applet and illustrations copyright (C) 2003 Tom Whittaker, S.V. Medaris, and Steve Ackerman. The Motion-W® and Bucky Badger® logos are trademarks of the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2010/make-rainbows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How can a tornado occur in January?</title>
		<link>http://whyfiles.org/2008/how-can-a-tornado-occur-in-january/</link>
		<comments>http://whyfiles.org/2008/how-can-a-tornado-occur-in-january/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Curiosities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorology weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tornado]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whyfiles.org/?p=2163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tornadoes can happen whenever atmospheric conditions are suitable, says Steve Ackerman, professor of atmospheric science at UW-Madison. Over the years, Wisconsin has had at least one tornado in every month except February. &#8220;To get any severe weather, we need really warm, moist air near the ground, and cool air aloft, which is typical of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tornadoes can happen whenever atmospheric conditions are suitable, says <a href="http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/wxwise/ack.html">Steve Ackerman</a>, professor of atmospheric science at UW-Madison. Over the years, Wisconsin has had at least one tornado in every month except February.</p>
<p>&#8220;To get any severe weather, we need really warm, moist air near the ground, and cool air aloft, which is typical of the spring, but not winter. But on Jan. 7, the temperature was in the 60s, and the snow was evaporating, moistening the lower level of the atmosphere, so we had spring-like conditions in Southern Wisconsin,” including Kenosha County.</p>
<p>The two tornadoes that struck Wheatland were powerful enough to destroy an estimated 26 houses, and damage about 75 others. No deaths or serious injuries were reported.</p>
<p>Tornadoes were also reported or suspected on the same day in Missouri, Arkansas, Illinois and Oklahoma, due to the cool air overtaking a warm, moist surface layer.</p>
<p>Another contributing factor on Jan. 7 was wind shear – a difference in wind directions between the lower and higher atmosphere. &#8220;The wind at the ground was from the south, and in the upper atmosphere it was from the southwest, which allowed the storms to develop rotation,” Ackerman says.</p>
<p>Once the warm, moist air starts to rise and spiral, he adds, the jet stream &#8220;acts like a vacuum, and as the air moves upward, the storm explodes.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whyfiles.org/2008/how-can-a-tornado-occur-in-january/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

