|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Looking
for trouble Alzheimer's
remains an autopsy diagnosis -- the only way to confirm a diagnosis is
to view brain slices under a microscope. Diagnosis has improved over time. Even without digging into the brain, a competent diagnostician can be accurate 90 percent of the time. Still, a foolproof diagnosis would be useful for finding patients who could benefit from existing drugs, for testing new drugs, and for backstopping incompetent diagnoses. Enter the magnetic resonance (MRI) machine, a mainstay of modern medicine. The machine uses a strong magnet and radio-frequency waves to evoke signals for computer processing into images of the body (more on MRI technology). As MRI machines became common, scientists have put them to new use. For example, Norbert Schuff of the San Francisco Veteran's Affairs Medical Center is using magnetic resonance to measure a chemical found in living neurons but not dead ones. Alzheimer's, you'll recall, savages neurons in brain regions that govern memory and thought. Absence
makes the brain grow weaker By itself, the structural information of a standard MRI can be difficult to interpret, Schuff says. "MRI measures basically the distribution of water in the brain." Therefore, an MRI may not specifically reflect the death of neurons in Alzheimer's. Adding MR spectroscopic imaging, however, allows measurements of brain chemicals such as NAA, which occurs only in living neurons.
Unfortunately, because NAA is scarce in the brain, the images don't carry the detail of a standard MRI. Still, the results are revealing. "The changes we observed are consistent with the regional patterns of damage seen in Alzheimer's disease," says Schuff. Although the combined image is not conclusive, he says, "it has the potential to improve our ability to diagnose Alzheimer's and to follow its progression." Are there any real cures on the horizon?
|
||||
![]() ![]() |
|||||
![]() |
There are 1
2 3 4 5
pages in this feature. Bibliography | Credits | Feedback | Search |