|
Dark days for the "Death Coast," the Cabo Vilán, Galicia coastline earned the name for the many shipping accidents. Courtesy © WWF-Canon / Raúl García. |
|
Oil on another beach
As the TV cameras zoom in, drawn to destruction like lawyers to a car wreck, the talking head discusses the blunders that caused the spill and the hasty decisions over the clean-up. Soon you'll hear the second-guessing and finger-pointing. Almost nothing beats a huge oil spill as a made-for-TV ecodisaster. Even though they are relatively common (history records 66 spills more than 10 million gallons) the cameras still show horrorific despoilation. Although the details were different, the Prestige spill reminded us of 1989, when the Exxon Valdez slobbered 37,000 tons of oil into Prince William Sound, Alaska. The Exxon Valdez was hardly the biggest spill -- it ranked 54th in size back in 1993. Looking back But Valdez was a highly controversial spill . Not only did it despoil a stunning sub-Arctic sound, but it was an American tragedy, with, shall we say, a certain resonance in the courtroom. (ExxonMobil is now contesting a court's unprecedented award of $5-billion in punitive damages for the spill. The company, having already paid for cleanup, damages to local residents, and research and ecological restoration in Prince William Sound, argues that the company neither deliberately spilled the oil, nor engaged in deceit, so punitive damages make no sense. "The $5 billion was justified, because you ought to punish Exxon, send a message to the industry," says Thomas Cirigliano, ExxonMobil spokesman. "Our response is that this company spent $3.2 billion on the spill, that ought to be a clear message that you better try not to spill oil.")
Finally, and for our purposes most importantly, Valdez was subjected to more research than any other spill in history. A fury in the Sound At any rate, 41.3 million liters of oil can do a lot of damage to an enclosed body of water, and to the plants and animals living there. Crude coated the rocks, sea birds and mammals. It gooked up feathers and fur, destroying insulation and killing mammals and birds alike. BELOW LEFT: Forty-two million
gallons of oil was transferred from the Exxon Valdez (left) to the smaller
Exxon Baton Rouge, limiting the spill into Prince William Sound to one-fifth
of Valdez's cargo. Photo by
NOAA It didn't take a genius to spot an ecological catastrophe. As volunteers and later Exxon-hired crews moved in to clean wildlife and the atrociously "oiled" beaches and rocks, we outsiders sat back to wonder: Would the Sound ever recover? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are 1 2
3 4 5 pages in this feature. Terry Devitt, editor; Sarah Goforth, project assistant; S.V. Medaris, designer/illustrator; David Tenenbaum, feature writer; Amy Toburen, content development executive ©2002, University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents. |